The article stresses the challenge creators face with negative feedback, cautioning against softening work to avoid criticism.
It debunks the idea that only strong positive reactions are beneficial, emphasizing the importance of both positive and negative responses for engagement.
The piece warns about the danger of indifference, asserting that indifference, rather than negative feedback, can lead to the swift decline of content and emotional well-being.
I always liked to believe that you should shoot for people either loving your content or hating it, the middle is the most confusing. The problem with the middle of the road is that it doesn’t strongly indicate where to go.
Strong emotions (good or bad) are naturally connected to motivation and drive. That’s why even contentious subjects online get so attention, because strong feels will get people to interact.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Once suspended, maven64 will not be able to comment or publish posts until their suspension is removed.
Once unsuspended, maven64 will be able to comment and publish posts again.
Once unpublished, all posts by maven64 will become hidden and only accessible to themselves.
If maven64 is not suspended, they can still re-publish their posts from their dashboard.
Once unpublished, this post will become invisible to the public
and only accessible to Maven.
They can still re-publish the post if they are not suspended.
Thanks for keeping Creative Brew safe. Here is what you can do to flag maven64:
Discussion (2)
I always liked to believe that you should shoot for people either loving your content or hating it, the middle is the most confusing. The problem with the middle of the road is that it doesn’t strongly indicate where to go.
Strong emotions (good or bad) are naturally connected to motivation and drive. That’s why even contentious subjects online get so attention, because strong feels will get people to interact.