The author questions the practical use of AI art, particularly in generating large quantities of low-effort digital content.
The primary identified use case for AI art seems to be flooding social media with numerous, potentially meaningless images, often for advertising or scams.
The article suggests that AI-generated content struggles to create anything genuinely new and quickly becomes visually dated, likening it to a high-tech version of Bitmoji.
AI generated visuals seem to struggle to bring genuine innovation and quickly becomes visually dated. I see tons of AI content used but genuinely am find it fade to the background, kind of like what this article mentions. I think we will naturally block it out as being cheap.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Once suspended, crissfuture will not be able to comment or publish posts until their suspension is removed.
Once unsuspended, crissfuture will be able to comment and publish posts again.
Once unpublished, all posts by crissfuture will become hidden and only accessible to themselves.
If crissfuture is not suspended, they can still re-publish their posts from their dashboard.
Once unpublished, this post will become invisible to the public
and only accessible to Criss F.
They can still re-publish the post if they are not suspended.
Thanks for keeping Creative Brew safe. Here is what you can do to flag crissfuture:
Discussion (1)
AI generated visuals seem to struggle to bring genuine innovation and quickly becomes visually dated. I see tons of AI content used but genuinely am find it fade to the background, kind of like what this article mentions. I think we will naturally block it out as being cheap.